
User-Centric KPIs
|Sep 29th 2025
5 min
Written by: Karl Evans
CEO
Most companies think they’re measuring customer service metrics. In reality, they’re only measuring themselves. Average handling time. Tickets closed per day. Agent productivity. These numbers look neat on dashboards, but they don’t tell you what really matters: how your users felt, and how long they were left waiting for a solution.
Efficiency doesn’t equal experience. A service that looks productive on paper can still leave users frustrated, unheard, and walking away from your brand. And that costs far more than any short-term gain in efficiency.
This post breaks down why most customer service metrics are flawed, and what leaders should focus on instead if they want to build trust, loyalty, and long-term growth.
Here’s the mistake: companies measure service from the inside out. They track what they’re doing and hope it reflects positively on the user. It rarely does.
The difference is everything. When you look from the inside out, you end up with busy dashboards and disengaged customers. From the outside in, you see the experience as your users see it, and you can adapt to improve it.
Strip it back, and service success comes down to just two measures:
Everything else is background noise. These two metrics keep teams focused where it counts: the user.
Further reading: Setting KPIs Based on the User Experience
Managers cling to traditional control metrics because that’s what the textbooks teach: efficiency, productivity, cost control. But if the aim is to deliver service that stands out, it’s time to rewrite the books.
Flawed metrics don’t necessarily break service, but they make it harder to deliver excellence. They push teams toward micro-measures that make them look good internally, without creating a better service externally.
Think of it like healthcare. If you measure a doctor’s productivity by how many patients they see in a day, how much equipment they use, and how much they cost, you get a very scary system.
But if you measure how well they understood the patient’s need, how quickly they helped, and whether the patient got better the first time, you build a system that works the way we’d all want.
That’s the difference between inside-out and outside-in.
When companies flip to user-first metrics, something shifts:
The result? Stronger trust, lower churn, and a brand that feels like it cares.
Further reading: Turning Customers Into a Marketing Army
The hidden cost of flawed metrics is churn and reputation. Just like marketing, you can’t always measure exactly how much a single ad, or a single bad service experience, changes the numbers. But over time, the momentum builds.
For example, a recent report shows that UK firms lose around £7.3 billion per month due to poor customer service (Institute of Customer Service). That’s not just inefficiency, that’s customers walking away.
And it’s not limited to one sector. Which? found that UK energy and broadband customers lost £298 million and 27.3 million hours last year due to poor service (Which?).
Want to make the shift? Start by looking at support the same way you look at marketing.
Marketing isn’t just a cost center. It’s an investment in visibility and brand reputation. It’s not about one advert or one campaign, it’s about the story you build over time.
Support is the same. It’s not about tickets closed. It’s about customers who stay.
It costs much less to look after the customers you already have than to find new ones.
That’s why metrics matter. Get them wrong, and you waste time proving efficiency that no user cares about. Get them right, and you build trust, loyalty, and a brand that lasts.